Today, i’ll be comparing the Google Nexus S 4G vs Motorola Atrix 4G vs the HTC EVO 3D. This started out as a Pros and Cons for my own personal reference being that I’m now eligible for my 2 year upgrade pricing on my Sprint line. So take this Pros and Cons list knowing that its my opinion, and subjected to my taste in phones. But I thought you guys might like the spec and feature comparison. Also there has to be a little feature speculation in my comparison because the HTC EVO 3D’s full specs and design haven’t been fully leaked – yet. I’m leaving the newly released Kyocera Echo out of this comparison because I’m looking for a high end device that works great out of the box. The reviews of the Kyocera Echo have really shown that while it has a great design innovation, it has bugs, and is the first of its kind. Android does not run smoothly on all test units, as well as the dual screens “Simul-task” are not supported by most applications. Once you start comparing the Echos 1GHz first generation Snapdragon processor, lack of 4G WiMAX, 3.5? non SAMOLED / SLCD screens, lack of enabled multitouch in the stock Android browser and Google maps, as well as its 0.68? / 17.2 mm thickness, made it drop out of this particular running as a premium handset for me. Also, please note that I am an Android user who carries two Smartphones around on me at all times so size does play into this comparison, and with all this said I have included the dimensions and weights of the handsets side by side for easy reference.

Google Nexus S 4G – 4.88? x 2.48? x 0.43? (123.9 x 63 x 10.88 mm), 4.55 oz (129 g)
Motorola Atrix 4G – 4.64? x 2.50? x 0.43? (117.75 x 63.5 x 10.95 mm), 4.76 oz (135 g)
HTC EVO 3D – 5.00? x 2.60? x 0.47? (127 x 66 x 12 mm), 6.00 oz (170 g)
Screen: 4.0? Super AMOLED WVGA 800×480 Contoured Display
Processor & GPU: 1GHz Hummingbird Cortex A8 Single Core
RAM: 512MB
Storage: 16GB Internal, no Micro SD card slot
Dimensions & Weight: 4.88? x 2.48? x 0.43? (123.9 x 63 x 10.88 mm), 4.55 oz (129 g)
Battery Size: 1500 mAh
Connectivity: EVDO, WiMAX, Wifi b/g/n, Bluetooth, NFC, DLNA, VOIP
Camera: 5.0MP Single LED flash autofocus, .3 VGA front facing camera, 720×480 video recordin
Buttons: Capacitive Buttons in odd layout, physical power and volume controls
OS: Stock Android 2.3 Gingerbread no modifications
Pure Google Android 2.3 GingerbreadSecond true Google branded phoneNexus S 4G most likely will get all the newest versions of Android before other handsetsComes with newest Android version out of the boxSAMOLED screen, very vibrant and brightHas new contoured display1500 mAh battery, supporting a SAMOLED which is known for its battery saving ability should make for good battery life16GB of Internal memory built inNear Field CommunicationVolume Buttons on Left Side, something I prefer but other might not care aboutMicro USB Charger port on bottom, good for universal dash phone mountsMost wireless connectivity options out of all offeringsHas a single core 1 GHz Hummingbird processor instead of a newer dual core512MB RAM4? screen instead of a 4.3?800×480 WVGA instead of the new 960×540 qHD resolutionNo Micro SD card slot720×480 video recording, not HDCapacitive Android buttons in odd configuration0.3MP VGA Front Facing CameraNo Touch Focus on cameraSingle LED FlashNo HDMI OutputPower button on right of phone towards the topNo LED notification lightSamsungs all plastic build quality
Screen: 4.0? TFT qHD 960×540
Processor & GPU: 1GHz dual core Nvidia Tegra2
RAM: 1024MB
Storage: 16GB Internal, Micro SD card slot however there is no Micro SD Card included
Dimensions & Weight: 4.64? x 2.50? x 0.43? (117.75 x 63.5 x 10.95 mm), 4.76 oz (135 g)
Battery Size: 1930mAh
Connectivity: EVDO, WiMAX, Wifi b/g/n, Bluetooth, DLNA, HDMI
Camera: 5.0MP Dual LED flash autofocus, 0.3 VGA front facing camera, 1280×720 video recording
Buttons: Capacitive Buttons in common layout, physical power and volume controls
OS: Android 2.2 with Motoblur Skin
960×540 qHD resolution on a 4? screenTegra2 dual core 1 GHz processor, but not as fast as the EVO 3D’s dual 1.2GHz1024 MB of RAMDual LED Flash1280×720 video recording16 GB + Micro SD card slotDLNANoise cancelling second micHDMI OutputFinger Print RecognitionStock Android button layoutOverall the smallest physical dimensionsMulti colored LED notification light1930mAh batteryLots of optional docks, laptop, mulitimedia, and PC dockSkinned Motoblur Android 2.2 without planned upgrade path, skin also makes for slower software4? screen instead of a 4.3?Standard TFT screen, not SAMOLED, or SLCD, but still very vibrant for a TFTNo Touch Focus on camera0.3MP VGA Front Facing CameraMicro USB Charger port on left side, interferes with some universal phone mountsOddly placed power button, angled in top center toward the rear of phoneVolume Buttons on the right side
Screen: 4.3? Super LCD Parallax 3D qHD 960×540
Processor & GPU: 1200Mhz Dual Core Snapdragon, Adreno 220
RAM: 1024MB
Storage: 4GB, MicroSD card slot, unknown capacity of included MicroSD card
Dimensions & Weight: 5.00? x 2.60? x 0.47? (127 x 66 x 12 mm), 6.00 oz (170 g)
Battery Size: 1730mAh
Connectivity: EVDO, WiMAX, Wifi b/g/n, Bluetooth, DLNA, HDMI
Camera: 5.0MP Dual LED flash Autofocus, 1.2MP front facing camera, 1920×1080 Full HD 2D Video Recording, 1280×720 3D Video Recording
Buttons: Capacitive Buttons in HTC layout, physical power, volume, camera buttons, and 2D – 3D camera switch
OS: Android 2.3 with HTC’s Sense UI v 3.0 skin
4.3? SLCD qHD 960×540 display, 3D with no glassesDual Core Snapdragon 1.2GHz1024MB RAMNew Adreno 220 GPUAndroid 2.3 out of the boxDual LED Flash1920×1080 Full HD Video Recording, 1280×720 3D Video RecordingMost likely to have Touch Focus5.0MP 3D Still Pictures1.3 MP Front Facing CameraHDMI OutputPhysical Camera ButtonHTCs button layout, I prefer HTCs Android button layoutPower button in predictable top rightMost likely will have LED notification lightHTCs awesome build qualityOnly 4GB Built in internal memoryLargest physical dimensionsVolume Buttons on the right sideRelatively small 1730 mAh compared to the Atrix 4G’s 1930mAh battery, plus 1730mAh is supporting a 4.3? SLCD, possibly bad battery lifeUnknown location of charging portSkinned HTC Sense UI Android 2.3 makes for slower software
Once you look over all the Pros and Cons of these three future handsets that are soon to be released by Sprint in the next couple months, you start to notice that my amount of Pros and lack of Cons start to lean in the HTC EVO 3D’s favor with the Motorola Atrix 4G coming in second place. What is funny though is once you put all of this in relative context as being weighed for purchase by a phone reviewer, the amount of Cons and the lack of Pros in the situation of the Google Nexus S 4G starts to take a different shape. The fact that the Nexus S is a true Google branded phone with the potential of being the first one with all the newest versions of Android, makes it, in my books, the best one to get. I can see that the HTC EVO 3D and the Motorola Atrix both have their positives and are VERY tempting.
However, for me, I believe I’ll be picking up a Google Nexus S once it is released and will have to pass on the other offerings. I’d like to be able to experience the newest versions of Android and not have to wait till the companies finally get around to adding their skin on top of the newest release. The fact that I also have owned a Samsung Galaxy S phone in the past (T-Mobile Samsung Vibrant) and loved it, this also plays into my decision. The only things I didn’t like about the Vibrant were a lack of certain features, namely the lack of a front facing camera, and the old version of Android, at the time it had only Android 2.1.
Note to all buyers there is one annoying issue with Sprint’s 4G service, unlike T-Mobile’s HSPA+ or Verizon’s LTE network you have to toggle the 4G WiMAX antennae on to get 4G speeds. You don’t have to do this on T-Mobile’s network as their HSPA+ antennae is the antennae that is on all the time, yet it does not kill the battery quickly. Verizon’s LTE network has been known to kill the HTC Thunderbolt 4G’s battery excessively fast leading the modding community to find a way to toggle its LTE radio on and off to conserve battery power. So in some ways the Sprint WiMAX based 4G toggle system does have its benefits. But if you were considering the T-Mobile Nexus S vs Sprints Nexus S 4G, just know that is a feature you would not have to deal with on T-Mobile’s unit.
What would you pick if it were you? Did I overlook anything in my analysis of the specs and potential Pros and Cons? Let me know what you think in the comments. Thanks everybody.
View the original article here